SHOULD WE BE PROUD OR ASHAMED OF THIS BUSINESS STORY ? TRUNG NGUYEN COFFEE NOW REVEALES

 

SHOULD WE BE PROUD OR ASHAMED OF THIS OLD STORY ? NOW REVEALES

INTRODUCTION: I don't know the mindset of this wealthy individual who has done so many outrageous things that it's beyond comprehension, but after disappearing for a few years, has suddenly made a huge comeback in Vietnam. This is considered welcome, and everyone is applauding. But very quickly, seeing the media's continuous praise and support, this businessman reverts to his old revenge schemes. He secretly conspires with someone abroad, forming a group that is now launching attacks on the media and online community. WHAT IS HE GOING ON? TO GET REVENGE AND SATISFY HIS COWARDLY SATISFACTION.

But the most shocking thing is that this businessman's enemy is actually his "ex-wife," who is still raising his four children from their relationship. This is truly terrible; who would dare trust or do business with her if they knew about this shameful situation?

This first article and video aims to remind everyone to understand and remember not to hastily believe those who blindly slander anyone, regardless of who is right or wrong.

A Vietnamese blogger needs to reiterate a story that I should have ignored, not complained about or pursued: during COVID, he knew I was sick and took advantage of the fact that my Viettel 8038 SIM card hadn't made any new calls for 60 days. 

Someone then deactivated my ownership of this SIM card and immediately sold it to someone else. Immediately after that, the malicious individual used this SIM card to verify my two-step verification    and then accessed my Google account to delete all videos related to GWOA.

Today I contacted Google and received specific instructions from YouTube and WordPress as follows: In principle, even if you have this Viettel SIM card, it was purchased new and registered with a new name. Then, accessing it using the "forgot password" method and the verification process via the SIM card number still demonstrates the true nature of this action as "IMITATING SOMEONE ELSE" TO ACCESS OTHER PEOPLE'S RESOURCES.

This constitutes a serious violation and a deliberate breach of the algorithm, causing confusion in the platform's security verification structure for individual users. Google encourages me to promptly complete the complaint form I submitted online and return it to them by mail. I will not argue or respond to any comments on this matter (the nature of the incident is self-evident; it is an event that has already occurred, not just vague speculation or unfounded predictions)